PIANC Smart Rivers 2022
Reviewing Presentation documents
Topic:
Inland Navigation Structure
Logistics
River System Management
Smart Shipping
Special Sessions
Waterway Infrastructure
Title:
Author(s):
Author
1
Name:
Affiliations:
Region:
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
America
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Barbados
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
China(Hong Kong)
China(Macao)
China(Tai wan)
Colombia
Comoros
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent And The Grenadine
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States of America
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Wallis and Futuna
Western Samoa
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Email:
Is corresponding author or not (one only):
Author
2
Name:
Affiliations:
Region:
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
America
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Barbados
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
China(Hong Kong)
China(Macao)
China(Tai wan)
Colombia
Comoros
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent And The Grenadine
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States of America
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Wallis and Futuna
Western Samoa
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Email:
Is corresponding author or not (one only):
Abstract :
*(250~1000 words)
Existing hydraulic structures may show damage with increasing age and operation, so that a structural verification is indicated. In addition, repair measures must be planned and their effectiveness demonstrated. The advent of improved structural analysis methods and subsequent standardization processes facilitate the verification of existing structures to ensure sufficient reliability of infrastructure. Among the existing inland navigation hydraulic structures, older ship locks had been constructed with primitive construction materials such as damped plain concrete. Where visual inspections is deemed inadequate as at times it was observed that the structure exhibited neither any serious damages nor indication for failure but failed to satisfy the limit states prescribed by the latest standards. This contribution considers a similar ship lock build in 1925 as a case study. The ship lock has a half-frame structural system with plain concrete gravity walls and lightly transverse reinforced base slab. Cross section based static verification revealed that the structure does not provide sufficient resistance in case of sliding and overturning limit states which could be attributed to crack and pore-water pressures in the cross section. Consequently rehabilitation for the lock walls with vertical anchoring system was proposed to conform to required standards. Similar problems are expected for other existing locks in the German waterway system; there-fore a methodology was developed to investigate the structural reliability of similar structures using full probabilistic methods while considering standard-based limit state functions. This involved uncertainty quantification of parameters for relevant loads (self-weight, water pressure, earth/ groundwater pressure, temperature, etc.) and materials (concrete, steel). For calculation of probability of failure and reliability indexes First Order Reliability Methods (FORM) was applied considering it computational efficiency and by-product parameter importance factors. Additionally Monte Carlo based simulation method i.e. Subset Simulation was employed to root out any possible influence of non-linearity on FORM results. For the lock from 1925, shown as an example, it can be shown for various verification formats that the minimum reliability index (Beta) without repair was 1.31 which does not meet today's reliability requirements, but that after reinforcement a reliability index of at least 4.05 can be achieved, so that the structure can achieve a further service life like a new hydraulic structure. The contribution provides methodology and application of probabilistic approach to verification of structural reliability of hydraulic structures without rehabilitation, the additional gain in case of rehabilitation and reliability based optimization of measures to achieve certain target reliability.
Key words:
(max: 5)
Reference no.
Slides:
click to download
Reject
Accept
Confirm Submission